because if you try to break up monopolies, you might

0
138

Properal u

3 points submitted 3 days agoThe Origonal video, Law Without Government (LWG) gives two options for people having a canada goose outlet kokemuksia dispute. One negotiating a peaceful settlement, the other resorting to violence. canada goose outlet parka Then the video canada goose parka outlet presents a third option with third party arbitration.Tew insinuates that the video claims that adding the option of arbitration, means violence won happen. Though it doesn make that claim at all.Tew askes, if they were willing to come to blows over their disagreement then why would either of them listen to a third party if he does not back up his decision by canada goose outlet uk sale force.Next Tew points out that people can already go to a third party. This is true. Then he askes why no one today goes to private third parties? He claims everyone goes to the government to have contracts enforced. I am not sure about that. Private arbitration is a growing industry. And often business is done without formal contracts and is enforced by “The Discipline of Constant Dealings”.Then Tew brings up the objectivist claim that markets only operate in the absence of force, so we can have markets in force. According to Tew you must get rid canada https://www.topcanadagoose.ca goose outlet reviews of force to have markets, force is the opposite of rational voluntary exchange. He claims in the canada goose factory outlet vancouver state of canada goose victoria parka outlet nature people don have freedom. They use force. You have to work up to a system that makes the use of retaliatory force objective and orderly.Of course, force is an alternative to the market. And those subject to force can be said to be at least partially excluded canada goose outlet toronto from the market. However clearly black markets operate in spite of the fact that the state monopoly of force prohibits them. So markets do function even when canada goose outlet belgium infringed by the use of force. We can hire security guards to use force to protect us, and gangsters can hire thugs to use force. Clearly, the are markets in force. Markets in force are not impossible canada goose uk site or contradictory. Further, the state does not get rid of force. It monopolizes it. So the state does not eliminate force from society.The next two videos in the series do go into more detail canada goose outlet store calgary into markets for law and bargaining.SRIrwinkill 5 points submitted 6 days agoAnother interesting canada goose outlet uk thing to look into is people in societies adopting recognizably capitalistic models without actually having those examples around from the outside. canada goose outlet eu Someone who doesn want to let go of their communist beliefs would say “well the area around it wasn communist or socialist, so the people got fooled into accepting a guilded hell.”Not saying there is any canada goose factory outlet meat to that arguments, but having an example of a society that had markets and capital without already being around it would help quash such concerns.glass20 1 points canada goose outlet location submitted 10 days ago> Then insider trading rules limited the ability of those that learned about the problems from coming forward without losing lots of money.This is an incredibly backwards thought process considering that if they know about the problems, they are fucked either way. If you learn your company is going to collapse within a year you can choose to sell off your stock or not, but either way, you are either going canada goose outlet in montreal to be doing something unethical or you are going to be fucked. Neither are good options, all that removing those insider trading regulations would be doing is making you able to choose one of those two bad options, and to be honest, I would consider fucking over an entire canada goose outlet in usa company of employees worse than one person losing out on money. Those people wouldn come forward in the first place without insider trading rules.> What Is Regulatory Capture? by Susan Dudley> Is Monopoly a Justification for Government Regulation? by Lynne KieslingI not trying to be an ass, but frankly the canada goose outlet official arguments in both of these videos are rather preposterous. As an aside, I don think either are relevant to the current topic, since Enron did not create regulations that forced consumers to buy their product (they just had dominance in a region, which would happen either way), and Enron issue wasn solely that it was a monopoly, yet I will address them anyways.The “regulatory capture” one I honestly, 100 could see this as a video a socialist would make. Seriously. All it does is make capitalism look bad. The argument presented is that a company, since they want profit, will fabricate canada goose outlet black friday sale regulations and convince a government to enforce them due to profit motive. Take away the government now all you do is have zero barrier between the company and that shady shit they want to do. Want to force people to buy your washing machine? Sure, now they can spend that money they would have spent bribing the government on a vast multitude of things to artificially make their washing machine seem like the only possibility. Maybe they spread unregulated lies in the media about how other companies washing machines give you cancer. Maybe they claim to have super energy efficient, environmentally friendly washing machines (which is the spirit of those regulations) when they actually don Maybe they just straight up sabotage the competition with their money to make their washing machines not viable and cover it up with the extra profit they make off it. There are SO canada goose jacket outlet toronto many things a company can do with money to make their product have artificial demand, and if your concern is that businesses are doing too many shady business practices with the government already, then you will be in a world of hurt when you canada goose outlet real take away the government and let those practices run completely unopposed. “Fake” regulations are a small price to pay for the HUGE issues you would have without any regulations whatsoever.Plus, couldn other washing machines just comply with those regulations anyways, and then be on a level playing field? canada goose outlet us I just don really understand how the argument is logical at all.As for “Monopoly” again, you are worrying about an incredibly minuscule problem, to try and justify a much bigger one that you are creating. Apparently, breaking up monopolies is bad. because if you try to break up monopolies, you might. accidentally. break up companies that aren monopolies? What? I seriously think the only argument presented canada goose outlet buffalo in this video is an emotional appeal to those that think “innovation” must never be under the slightest threat of being hindered, and apparently you can have innovation without monopolies? You are painting a picture of a guy sitting Canada Goose Outlet in his office, trying to come up with a business idea, and then being like “oh shit, but what about those anti monopoly regulations! damn, guess I can make this new product to disrupt the industry because eventually my company might become too big and the government could start bullying me once I made my 100 billionth dollar, that a sign I need to throw my idea in the garbage bin”. It just bullshit.No, I mean Enron is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to not having enough regulation. You have a deregulated system, you get Enron, you have a nonregulated system, you get Enron times one hundred.If you have a tighly regulated system, you probably won get Enron.> That was not the claim of that video at all. She was merely pointing out that regulation favors larger firms, over smaller firms.Which is objectively false. She talks about how innovation is stifled with anti monopoly regulations. This is code for “monopolies are good because innovation is good”, if you take the literal inverse of that statement. 8 points submitted 10 days agoI can possibly fathom how canada goose jacket outlet store that would be a fundamental rule of regulation, especially considering the possibility of anti monopoly regulations.It very simple. If every company needs a compliance department to comply with regulations then the cost of compliance is smaller per dollar of profit for lager firms.No, I mean Enron is the tip of the canada goose kensington parka uk iceberg when it comes to not having enough regulation. You have a deregulated system, you get Enron, you have a nonregulated system, you get Enron times one hundred.

canada goose black friday sale

Canada Goose Outlet

canada goose coats

canada goose deals

canada goose coats

Canada Goose Outlet

cheap Canada Goose

buy canada goose jacket cheap

canadian goose jacket

canada goose store

canada goose deals

canada goose clearance

buy canada goose jacket cheap

Canada Goose online

Canada Goose Parka

Canada Goose Parka

cheap Canada Goose

Canada Goose Jackets

cheap Canada Goose

Canada Goose sale

Canada Goose sale

canadian goose jacket

Canada Goose online

canada goose coats

canada goose black friday sale

DEIXE UMA RESPOSTA

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here